office girls, Bowden

The  Australian photographic context or reference point for the street work in the  Bowden project  is probably the  Candid Camera: Australian Photography 1950s-1970s exhibition at the Art Gallery of South Australia  in 2010. This  was  curated by Julie Robinson, the Art Gallery’s Senior Curator of Prints, Drawings & Photographs. Candid in this context presumably  means the  photography  is done in such a way that the subjects are not aware they are being photographed at the exact moment the image is being made.

The exhibition included work by familiar photographers: Max Dupain, David Moore, Jeff Carter, Max Pam,  Robert McFarlane, Mervyn Bishop, Rennie Ellis, Carol Jerrems and Roger Scott. It covered the photojournalism of the 1960s,  social documentary,  as well as  subjective personal street photography of the 1970s. Marcus Bunyan’s wonderful  Art Blart  blog has some  of the images in the exhibition.

Bowden’s factories and warehouses were still in existence in the 1980s,  and the lunch hour between 12 and 1pm saw a fairly active street life as people walked to and from  the local corner deli to buy their lunch. Representing this  everydayness in terms of cultural value  is what commercial imagery would ignore, flatten and  dismiss. Cultural value means that the photography  has benefit for people  in some way,  or engages them in some way regardless of whether it’s sellable.

office girls, Bowden

office girls, Bowden

The Bowden street photography  was  black and white,  straight images and  traditional analog.    It was fairly straight forward in its realist approach  and rhetoric to representing a decaying, vanishing Australia.  It concern with memories  of this inner suburb  meant that the project didn’t buy into  two central strands   of common understanding of documentary in the 1930s or 1940s. This was  the “universal language” myth (photography constitutes a language in its own right that can communicate to all  the people on the planet), and the transparency of representation myth (a photograph “was what it was” and it had a direct relationship with seeing.)

The exhibition catalogue  for the Candid Camera exhibition  says that the exhibition is a survey of Australian documentary photography in the post war period. It explores the influence of international trends towards social documentary and photojournalism on local photographers. It demonstrated the interest of successive generations of photographers in creating unposed, spontaneous and candid records of contemporary life.

The exhibition’s main theme was to illuminate a common visual language for documentary photography, involving visual puns, juxtapositions, observations of absurd situations and the pursuit of the ‘decisive moment’ as popularised by the French photographer Henri Cartier-Bresson. The exhibition’s research contribution was to identify the ways in which Australian photographers used these elements in widely varied ways. It is street photography that is enigmatic,  quirky and more often than not surreal, not documentary photography.

The Bowden street work was straightforward in that I had no understanding of the American modernist  playing around  with the visual language of  documentary photography, involving visual puns, juxtapositions, observations of absurd situations. Even though I’d rejected nineteenth century positivism and conception of the transparency of photographic language, I  didn’t really understand what Lee Friedlander and Garry Winogrand were doing  with their street photography.  New York was a very long way from Bowden, Adelaide in the 1980s.

It struck me that the curators and directors of Australian photography institutions and contemporary art spaces were responding to a cultural cringe in Australia in the 198os. They used the uplift in public funding  their modus operandi to establish Australian photography as world class,  to establish an international profile for photography in Australia, and curated Australian photography  works to ensure that it was part of  the international  festivals and biennales.  International standards in the 1980s still meant US formalist modernism and the modernist notion of galleries as a clear white space in which art is placed with some kind of clinical neutrality and in which cultural experimentation takes place.

The Bowden project was produced completely outside galleries and the art world and it remains outside the  public gallery system that often recycles the same old faces and images.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s